Cessna 172S vs Cessna 210
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
- For sale now
- 33
- Median asking
- $325,000
- Range
- $103,400–$589,500
- Listed on 2+ marketplaces
- 10
- Source marketplaces
- 6
- Model years available
- 1977–2028
- For sale now
- 177
- Median asking
- $249,750
- Range
- $90,200–$695,000
- Listed on 2+ marketplaces
- 56
- Source marketplaces
- 17
- Model years available
- 1960–2021
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Generations Breakdown
Per-generation specs — engine/weight/performance differ materially across production eras.
Per-era “For sale” counts exclude listings with unspecified year and separate variants (RG retractable, Hawk XP), so they may not sum to the total above.
Cessna 172S — 5 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 172 Continental | 1956–1967 | Continental O-300 | 2300 | 118 | 520 | 108 |
| 172 O-320 150hp | 1968–1976 | Lycoming O-320-E2D | 2300 | 120 | 585 | 105 |
| 172 O-320 160hp | 1977–1986 | Lycoming O-320-H2AD/D2J | 2400 | 122 | 585 | 89 |
| 172R | 1996–2007 | IO-360-L2A | 2450 | 120 | 520 | 19 |
| 172S | 1998–now | IO-360-L2A | 2550 | 124 | 518 | 40 |
Cessna 210 — 4 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 210 IO-470 (260hp) | 1960–1963 | Continental IO-470-E | 2900 | 160 | 700 | 24 |
| 210 IO-520 (NA) | 1964–1986 | Continental IO-520-A/L | 3800 | 171 | 900 | 43 |
| T210 Turbo | 1966–1986 | Continental TSIO-520-R | 3800 | 193 | 950 | 57 |
| P210 Pressurized | 1978–1986 | Continental TSIO-520-P | 4000 | 200 | 1000 | 53 |
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna 172S | Cessna 210 |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 410 | 819 |
| Serious | 16 | 64 |
| Fatal | 45 | 192 |
| Fatalities | 80 | 413 |
| % Fatal | 11% | 23% |
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec / Model | Cessna 172S | Cessna 210 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $103,400 – $589,500 | $90,200 – $695,000 |
| Category | Single Engine Piston | Single Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 4 | 6 |
| Horsepower | 145–180 HP | 260–325 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 118–124 kts (230 km/h) | 160–200 kts (370 km/h) |
| Range | 518–585 nm (1,083 km) | 700–1,000 nm (1,852 km) |
| Service Ceiling | — | 17,300 ft (5,273 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 2300–2,550 lbs (1,157 kg) | 2900–4,000 lbs (1,814 kg) |
| Useful Load | 878 lbs (398 kg) | 1,310 lbs (594 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | — | 90.0 gal (341 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 8.5 GPH (32 L/h) | 14.5 GPH (55 L/h) |
| TBO | 2,000 hrs | 1,700 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $30,000 | $35,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $18,000 | $22,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $130 | $175 |
| Engines | 1 x Reciprocating | 1 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 172S
Cessna 210
Which Should You Buy: Cessna 172S or Cessna 210?
Pick the 172S if…
- Lower operating cost — ~$130/hr vs $175/hr.
- Newer design — production from 1998 vs 1960.
Pick the 210 if…
- Budget matters — from $90,200 vs $103,400, you save ~$13,200.
- More seats — 6 vs 4.
- Faster cruise — 160 kts vs 124 kts.
- Longer range — 700 nm vs 518 nm.
- More inventory — 176 listings vs 34.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.