Cessna 310L vs Beechcraft Baron 58
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
Cessna 310L
- For sale now
- 4
- Listed on 2+ marketplaces
- 3
- Source marketplaces
- 3
- Model years available
- 1966–1967
Beechcraft Baron 58
- For sale now
- 121
- Median asking
- $449,000
- Range
- $189,635–$1,319,400
- Listed on 2+ marketplaces
- 40
- Source marketplaces
- 11
- Model years available
- 1970–2024
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna 310L | Beechcraft Baron 58 |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 28 | — |
| Serious | 2 | — |
| Fatal | 5 | — |
| Fatalities | 7 | — |
| % Fatal | 18% | — |
Full Specs Comparison
Swipe to see all specs
| Spec / Model | Cessna 310L | Beechcraft Baron 58 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $133,475 – $184,925 | $189,635 – $1,319,400 |
| Category | Multi Engine Piston | Multi Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 6 | 6 |
| Horsepower | 260 HP | — |
| Cruise Speed | 193 kts (357 km/h) | 190 kts (352 km/h) |
| Range | 800 nm (1,482 km) | 1,225 nm (2,269 km) |
| Service Ceiling | — | 20,688 ft (6,306 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 5,200 lbs (2,359 kg) | 5,500 lbs (2,495 kg) |
| Useful Load | 1,700 lbs (771 kg) | 1,846 lbs (837 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | — | 166.0 gal (628 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 24.0 GPH (91 L/h) | 28.0 GPH (106 L/h) |
| TBO | 1,500 hrs | 1,700 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $32,000 | $40,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $28,000 | $28,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $300 | $310 |
| Engines | 2 x Reciprocating | 2 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 310L
Fuel$132/hr
Variable$300/hr
Annual Fixed$28,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$88,000/yr
Beechcraft Baron 58
Fuel$154/hr
Variable$310/hr
Annual Fixed$28,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$90,000/yr
Which Should You Buy: Cessna 310L or Beechcraft Baron 58?
Pick the 310L if…
- Budget matters — from $133,475 vs $189,635, you save ~$56,160.
- Lower operating cost — ~$300/hr vs $310/hr.
- Faster cruise — 193 kts vs 190 kts.
Pick the Baron 58 if…
- Longer range — 1225 nm vs 800 nm.
- Newer design — production from 1970 vs 1966.
- More inventory — 122 listings vs 4.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Cessna 310L or Beechcraft Baron 58?
It depends on your mission and budget.
The 310L cruises at 193 kts with 800 nm range.
The Baron 58 cruises at 190 kts with 1,225 nm range.
Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Cessna 310L: from $189,500.
Beechcraft Baron 58: from $575,000.
Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
What's the difference between Cessna 310L and Beechcraft Baron 58?
310L engine: Continental O-470-V;O-470-VU (260 hp).
Cruise: 193 vs 190 kts.
Range: 800 vs 1225 nm.
Which is cheaper to operate per hour?
310L: about $300/hr variable cost.
Baron 58: about $310/hr variable cost.
Variable cost includes fuel, reserves and overhaul accruals. Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add to the total.
Which has more seats and useful load?
310L: 6 seats / 1,700 lb useful load.
Baron 58: 6 seats / 1,846 lb useful load.
Useful load = max gross weight minus empty weight; it determines how much fuel plus payload you can carry.
How does maintenance compare — TBO and overhaul cost?
310L: 1,500-hour TBO, overhaul ~$32,000.
Baron 58: 1,700-hour TBO, overhaul ~$40,000.
Reaching the time-between-overhaul (TBO) triggers a mandatory engine/airframe rebuild that affects resale value.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices updated daily · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data