Cessna TU206 vs Piper Cherokee
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
Cessna TU206
- For sale now
- 5
- Listed on 2+ marketplaces
- 3
- Source marketplaces
- 4
- Model years available
- 1975–2008
Piper Cherokee
- For sale now
- 602
- Median asking
- $116,400
- Range
- $59,948–$277,250
- Listed on 2+ marketplaces
- 164
- Source marketplaces
- 23
- Model years available
- 1961–2026
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna TU206 | Piper Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 170 | 1 |
| Serious | 12 | 0 |
| Fatal | 46 | 0 |
| Fatalities | 122 | 0 |
| % Fatal | 27% | 0% |
Full Specs Comparison
Swipe to see all specs
| Spec / Model | Cessna TU206 | Piper Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $249,182 – $614,275 | $59,948 – $277,250 |
| Category | Single Engine Piston | Single Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 6 | 4 |
| Horsepower | 310 HP | 150 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 148 kts (274 km/h) | 117 kts (217 km/h) |
| Range | 800 nm (1,482 km) | 525 nm (972 km) |
| Service Ceiling | — | 14,300 ft (4,359 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 3,600 lbs (1,633 kg) | 2,150 lbs (975 kg) |
| Useful Load | 1,340 lbs (608 kg) | 850 lbs (386 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | — | 50.0 gal (189 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 15.0 GPH (57 L/h) | 8.0 GPH (30 L/h) |
| TBO | 1,800 hrs | 2,000 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $38,000 | $28,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $24,000 | $16,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $170 | $120 |
| Engines | 1 x Reciprocating | 1 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna TU206
Fuel$82/hr
Variable$170/hr
Annual Fixed$24,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$58,000/yr
Piper Cherokee
Fuel$44/hr
Variable$120/hr
Annual Fixed$16,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$40,000/yr
Which Should You Buy: Cessna TU206 or Piper Cherokee?
Pick the TU206 if…
- More seats — 6 vs 4.
- Faster cruise — 148 kts vs 117 kts.
- Longer range — 800 nm vs 525 nm.
- Newer design — production from 1977 vs 1961.
Pick the Cherokee if…
- Budget matters — from $59,948 vs $249,182, you save ~$189,234.
- Lower operating cost — ~$120/hr vs $170/hr.
- More inventory — 630 listings vs 5.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Cessna TU206 or Piper Cherokee?
It depends on your mission and budget.
The TU206 cruises at 148 kts with 800 nm range.
The Cherokee cruises at 117 kts with 525 nm range.
Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Cessna TU206: from $226,979.
Piper Cherokee: from $58,000.
Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
What's the difference between Cessna TU206 and Piper Cherokee?
TU206 engine: Continental TSIO-520-C (310 hp).
Seats: 6 vs 4.
Cruise: 148 vs 117 kts.
Range: 800 vs 525 nm.
Which is cheaper to operate per hour?
TU206: about $170/hr variable cost.
Cherokee: about $120/hr variable cost.
Variable cost includes fuel, reserves and overhaul accruals. Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add to the total.
Which has more seats and useful load?
TU206: 6 seats / 1,340 lb useful load.
Cherokee: 4 seats / 850 lb useful load.
Useful load = max gross weight minus empty weight; it determines how much fuel plus payload you can carry.
How does maintenance compare — TBO and overhaul cost?
TU206: 1,800-hour TBO, overhaul ~$38,000.
Cherokee: 2,000-hour TBO, overhaul ~$28,000.
Reaching the time-between-overhaul (TBO) triggers a mandatory engine/airframe rebuild that affects resale value.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices updated daily · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data