Dassault Falcon 900B vs Bombardier Challenger 605

Live Market Snapshot

Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily

Dassault Falcon 900B
For sale now
15
Listed on 2+ marketplaces
6
Source marketplaces
6
Model years available
1987–1995
Bombardier Challenger 605
For sale now
19
Listed on 2+ marketplaces
11
Source marketplaces
7
Model years available
2007–2023

Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.

Safety Record

Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.

NTSB (1982–now)Dassault Falcon 900BBombardier Challenger 605
All events1
Serious1
Fatal0
Fatalities0
% Fatal0%

Full Specs Comparison

Swipe to see all specs
Spec / Model Dassault Falcon 900B Bombardier Challenger 605
Dassault Falcon 900B
View 14 listings →
Median $6,445,000
View 18 listings →
Median $12,000,000
Price Range $6,224,500 – $6,494,500 $12,000,000
Category Large Cabin Jet Large Cabin Jet
Model Specifications
Seats 14 12
Cruise Speed 466 kts (863 km/h) 450 kts (833 km/h)
Range 3,364 nm (6,230 km) 4,045 nm (7,491 km)
Service Ceiling 51,000 ft (15,545 m) 41,000 ft (12,497 m)
Max Gross Weight 45,500 lbs (20,639 kg) 48,200 lbs (21,864 kg)
Useful Load 13,000 lbs (5,897 kg)
Fuel Capacity 2,850.0 gal (10787 L)
Fuel Burn 250.0 GPH (946 L/h) 310.0 GPH (1173 L/h)
TBO 5,000 hrs 5,000 hrs
Overhaul Cost $550,000 $600,000
Annual Fixed $600,000 $650,000
Hourly Variable $3,600 $3,900
Engines 3 x Turbofan 2 x Turbofan

Cost of Ownership

Estimate

Dassault Falcon 900B

Fuel$1,375/hr
Variable$3,600/hr
Annual Fixed$600,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr) $1,320,000/yr

Bombardier Challenger 605

Fuel$1,705/hr
Variable$3,900/hr
Annual Fixed$650,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr) $1,430,000/yr

Which Should You Buy: Dassault Falcon 900B or Bombardier Challenger 605?

Pick the Falcon 900B if…

  • Budget matters — from $6,224,500 vs $12,000,000, you save ~$5,775,500.
  • Lower operating cost — ~$3600/hr vs $3900/hr.
  • More seats — 14 vs 12.
  • Faster cruise — 466 kts vs 450 kts.

Pick the Challenger 605 if…

  • Longer range — 4045 nm vs 3364 nm.
  • Newer design — production from 2007 vs 1987.
  • More inventory — 18 listings vs 14.

Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Dassault Falcon 900B or Bombardier Challenger 605?
It depends on your mission and budget. The Falcon 900B cruises at 466 kts with 3,364 nm range. The Challenger 605 cruises at 450 kts with 4,045 nm range. Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Dassault Falcon 900B: from $6,500,000. Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
What's the difference between Dassault Falcon 900B and Bombardier Challenger 605?
Challenger 605 engine: General Electric CF34-3B. Seats: 14 vs 12. Cruise: 466 vs 450 kts. Range: 3364 vs 4045 nm.
Which is cheaper to operate per hour?
Falcon 900B: about $3600/hr variable cost. Challenger 605: about $3900/hr variable cost. Variable cost includes fuel, reserves and overhaul accruals. Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add to the total.
Which has more seats and useful load?
Falcon 900B: 14 seats. Challenger 605: 12 seats / 13,000 lb useful load. Useful load = max gross weight minus empty weight; it determines how much fuel plus payload you can carry.
How does maintenance compare — TBO and overhaul cost?
Falcon 900B: 5,000-hour TBO, overhaul ~$550,000. Challenger 605: 5,000-hour TBO, overhaul ~$600,000. Reaching the time-between-overhaul (TBO) triggers a mandatory engine/airframe rebuild that affects resale value.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices updated daily · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data