Kitfox Classic 4 vs Aeroprakt A-22L Foxbat
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Kitfox Classic 4 | Aeroprakt A-22L Foxbat |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 1 | — |
| Serious | 0 | — |
| Fatal | 0 | — |
| Fatalities | 0 | — |
| % Fatal | 0% | — |
Full Specs Comparison
Swipe to see all specs
| Spec / Model | Kitfox Classic 4 | Aeroprakt A-22L Foxbat |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $37,000 | — |
| Category | Experimental | — |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | — | 1 |
| Engines | — | 1 x Piston |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Kitfox Classic 4 or Aeroprakt A-22L Foxbat?
It depends on your mission and budget.
Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Kitfox Classic 4: from $37,000.
Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
What's the difference between Kitfox Classic 4 and Aeroprakt A-22L Foxbat?
A-22L Foxbat engine: Rotax 912ULS.
Which is cheaper to operate per hour?
Variable cost includes fuel, reserves and overhaul accruals. Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add to the total.
Which has more seats and useful load?
A-22L Foxbat: 1 seats.
Useful load = max gross weight minus empty weight; it determines how much fuel plus payload you can carry.
How does maintenance compare — TBO and overhaul cost?
Reaching the time-between-overhaul (TBO) triggers a mandatory engine/airframe rebuild that affects resale value.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices updated daily · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data