Pilatus PC-24 Safety Record — Super Versatile Jet | AeroGurus
Editorial safety summary — see Pilatus PC-24 listings and consult a qualified A&P/inspector for individual aircraft decisions.
The Pilatus PC-24 has a strong safety record consistent with its modern light jet class — twin Williams FJ44-4A turbofans with excellent reliability, Honeywell ACE avionics with synthetic vision, single-pilot type certification with intensive training requirements. As the only certified jet for unimproved airstrip operations, the PC-24 demands specific pilot training for rough-field operations beyond standard light jet training. Fleet safety record since 2017 entry-into-service has been favourable; pilot-factor accidents (typical light jet runway operations) dominate the incident record rather than airframe or engine issues.
Common safety topics
- Williams FJ44-4A twin-engine reliability — excellent fleet record; twin redundancy provides
- Honeywell ACE avionics with synthetic vision — modern situational awareness; reduces CFIT
- Rough-field jet operations — unique operational profile demanding specific training;
- Single-pilot operations — type rating intensive; insurance recurrent training required.
Pre-buy safety checklist
- Williams TAP engine program enrollment status both engines.
- Hot section inspection status.
- Airframe inspection — rough-field-operated aircraft may have specific wear patterns.
- Cargo door function and seal condition.
- ACE software revision and database currency.
- Pilot training plan — Pilatus PC-24 type rating + rough-field specific training.
- Mandate compliance — comprehensive on young aircraft.
Safety FAQ
- PC-24 safety vs Phenom 300?
- Both have strong fleet records. PC-24 adds rough-field capability;
- Twin-engine in PC-24?
- Yes — Williams FJ44-4A twin turbofans provide engine-out redundancy.
- Rough-field accident risk?
- Higher than paved-strip operations across any jet; proper training
- Type rating requirement?
- Yes — intensive single-pilot type rating training; insurance